The Jedi administrative board shall have no fewer than 3 members?

On average, everyone strongly agrees with nonconsensus between 795 voters.

Reasons To Disagree

I DISAGREE ON GROUNDS THAT A SOLUTION IS ABSENT IN THIS AS WELL. THIS IS AN IDEAL. HOW WOULD YOU PURPOSE THAT TO HAPPEN?

well.....thats alot of power for three people...like Abraham licoln once said, "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." not saying im distrusting of the administration its just better to be safe then sorry.

as already stated

should have more people to give more options

If there is one unusual being of prowess and mental power, why not let that one lead us all.

Always 12.Never less or more.

how the Jedi council of old The Council was made up of five lifetime members, four long-term members, and three limited-term members

the council should remain 12

This number is far too small when deciding matters for thousands. 12 members are sufficient, as the Ascended Master Jedi Jesus had 12. This was viewd as enough to change the history of this world via the teachings of the Christ.

location and and number represented for the issue should matter, but otherwise a minimum of 6 for any small issue or 12 for a larger issue

If we were able to establish one true leader, they could become both a figure head, and a master to all those unfamiliar with the ways of the force. And it is impossible to disguise impurity in the eyes of so many. If the leader is too weak, he/she shall be replaced with a purer candidate.

not enough

It should be on an rotational way from the member council.

Eleven is a good workable group size. The only valid reason for allowing the council to be less would be if there are fewer than 11 Jedi remaining in existence.

Ciuncil should have a set number.

the number should be based on numbers in the church and in regions

A Quorum hould be at least 7 for any major decisions. Urgent or on the spot decisions for local reasons may be fewer but a minimum of three. Learn to trust the wisdom within.

12 is much better. It allows more minds to be involved and gives time to allow a matter to be dicussed and better resolved.

This would not voice enough opinions.

12 is greater then 3, you get more views with 12 members.

Scrap the board decisions should be made like this

Well....No. It should have about 10.

there should be no adminastrative board no1 has the right to be above any1

3 is too small, the smallest number in the power group should be 9 or 11.

i think more than 3

5

You need more than three to get anything done. Five should be a minimum, seven is better, anything more than 11 becomes more challenging.

Perhaps 12 we should have, if there are never less nor more than 2 Sith agents, a Sith Lord and Sith Padawan then perhaps we should seek more Jedi Masters. kiz

there should only be one. Gary 'The God King' McF

i say at least 6 for there are to many members and force use for 3 ppl to handle

As with to many members to few will also cause trouble in the long run of things

5? is better

more the merryer

There should be 13 at all times. 13 is an odd number, therefore there can be no ties, and it is neither too high or too low, so there is enough room for various opinions.

Should not have less than 5.

Three is too low of a number. No less than 11.

12 in a Supreme Council, additionally with 1 for every __ members.

Three cannot decide the fate of an entire religion.

3 is too little, i would very much like to discuss this in detail if someone would like to contact me. May The Force Be With You, Obi Sims.

Again, there should always be 12

Shall have no fewer than 7 members. 3 isn't enough amd puts too much power into 3 jedi's hands

Needs more members to prevent corruption

The minimum number should be 5. With three the power is in too few hands and one member could easily be lead by the others.

No, that is definitely too small for an appropriate agreement.

more than 3!

No definition of this board is given. Is this the Jedi Counsel or is this purely an administrative function? If this board is for purely administrative action separate from the Jedi Counsel of 12, then 3 is a good number to take care of administrative duties like maintaining this website, etc.

If there are 3 members there are not enough supporting ideas floating around the administrasive to think about and think through. At minimum there should be 13.

there would be to many ties

There should be one member of the Jedi Council and that should be me. ========D

Wtf more. I'm here to remake hermetics aka this. There should be a vote for master/ administrator which picks leader so 50% for them 50% for every one else. I'm Mickeal

Reasons To Agree

I agree, if less then 3 members are in power, who will keep those 3 people in line?

3 is a good number. one to agree, one to disagree and one to confuse both sides

i think 3 because "3 is a good number. one to agree, one to disagree and one to confuse both sides" - not my words. is a very good statement!

it needs more but never less than three

Such power can become a burden to one single jedi, or even two. this is a path that would certainly lead to the dark side of the force.

If you had fewer than it could get nasty.

Too much power in the hands of too few would be disastrous. To be fair, I think that a representative system should be worked out in order to decide what is best for all Jedi.

A local chapter should have no less than 3. The grand council should have 13.

anything under 3 is not good for decision making - yet 3 is also way too small - if 3 is reached - everything should be done to bring it back up to 12.

We need more than three people one or two is not democrocy now is it

IF LESS THAN 12 THEN NO VOTE CAN TAKE PLACE.

no ties and the agreement of at least two masters

agree there needs to be far more, Or the individual Ministries will not be very well represented

There should be 12 but The Jedi Administrative board can function temporarily with only 3 members guided by the Force.

If you are getting les then 3 you are starting to look at the posibility of absolute power which leads to the dark side

Those that have power will be unwilling to let go of that power and lead them to the dark side. More is better

While I was neutral on the subject of having no more than 12 members, having any less than 3 will only put the Jedi at risk, as it would be harder to stop any forms of corruption into the sith.

No less then 3, better 5.

Yes by having three it allows them to keep each other in line- one would result in him/her being consumed by self importance and eventually power,and if by havin two the more in charge would be able to persuade the second more easily than if there were three. Therefore 3 is a good number as they can support the other members of the administrative board so that no bad decisions are made or anyone is consumed by power etc.

If there were 2 you open yourself to a splitting of opinion that could result in a splitting of the Order. If there was one, you would be inviting a dictatorship.

Um three is once again i stated is fine um u don't need a ton of members to answer one issue it only takes a few always than that we wouldn't get any where now would we? So i prefer a mid range such as 5 or 7 but three is fine

There should be 12

This idea can stop dictatorship within the ministeries of the Jedi church.

A representative system should be in place to ensure that there is not too much power in the hands of too few.

12 is a good number. i also believe that for every decision two people should be appointed, one for each side before the counsel is made aware of the question. that way all members should have an unbiased view of all sides, or at least strive for one.

Administrative responsibilities can be a heavy burden on 1 or 2 people.

VERY minimum. Personally I believe no less and no more than 12 at any one time.

11 or 13, multi-national. Increases chance of differing views, but makes ties impossible.

Some consider Paul to be the thirtheen Apostle and Jesus gave him and Peter a vision of this addition and what about Jesus himself wouldn't that make 14. I beleive a number of members should evolve with the growing numbers of the Order. A council member for so many members in the Order. But definitely never less than 7 that is an uneven number to help keep balance a center piece of heavy decision making when the Order is low in Numbers.

Only in an emergency should the council ever get down to three members and should never go below that. Remember that the Sith were a rule of 2, a master and aprentice and the size was to hide their actions....we have nothing to hide and should act and be a size accourding.

Yes

The mass is easily swayed by popular opinion, and non Jedi ethics, however no individual Jedi should be place in a such a position of potential corruption.

3 members for over like 20000 people! i think we need more

There must be proper representation of all members regardless. Three seems too small a number in the best of times

Always necessary for a quorum.

The BALANCE is well

13 is the Numeber

We need atleast three to have a group disscussion in the board protecting public intrest. There are now three main views to be seen, dissagree, agree, and neutrality. The inclusion of 3+ members without the chatter of more than 12 allows the important matters to be disscused thoroughly, voted apon, and completed in a subjective manner. One person is more likely to serve himself, two are unlikely to complete a task with similar risks.

One of sword, one of might, one of sight and one of knowledge. Compassion, love, wisdom, enlightenment.

It's an absurd concept to even think of it as a "board" if there are less than 3 members on it. How is this even a question?

we must not allow this order to become a dictatorship

Important decisions should not fall upon so few.

Obvously!

The rule of 2... We could become sith!

actually it should be no fewer than 10 but never a number that can divide equally without 1 extra (example 9 can be split equally 3 times were as 13 cannot.)

13 The Council of Twelve Grand Master. Simple as.

31 is the way for The Jedi Administrative to be.

Should something happen to the majority of the board, 3 people can lead reasonably. It is doubtful 10 or more of the board will be gone at all times.

we should have a board with a member from every country

Well certainly there should be more than three. There should be way more than three. There should be at least twelve.

A prime number will do. 13 is good.

Three is the lowest it should ever go, and only short term aswell.

we need to be world wide present, so 1 ambassador per continent is a must

If two disagree there can be no resolve, if there was only one it may not be in the best interests of the jedi order so three is the least number needed but the more the merrier and the minimum should be 13

Agree.They could turn to the darkside and lead a dictatorship if it was only one or two.

This is important so as there is not a dictatorship type situation

We want the administrative authority to be a democracy not a dictatorship, we want the council to decide what is right for the church and not what is right for them

I agree. That is too few to have control of the Jedi.

I completly agree. There needs to be more than 3 people, but it must be kept an odd number to reach an answer at the end of a vote. If there are 2 people, then there may always be a tie depending on their beliefs. If there is only one, then that one person may take control of the power he/she has, using it for corruption and darkness. As well as this, other people ideas and beliefs may not be taken into account.

no fewer yes but that does seem low

... but we should add "three experienced and prudent members"

Three is a bit low for the minimum, but it's better than 2!

If there are too few Jedi on the board, they will not have enough influence from fellow Jedi to remain uncorrupted by power.

4 or 6 3 is to much power for 3 people to handle alone

No fewer than three for sure but I believe more members are needed.

Many jurisdictions require 3 directors as the minimum. It is an unwritten industry standard for legitimacy. Also, it is best when forming a small board to preclude executive officers as voting members. Are the board officers insured?

I think more should be given for the board perhaps 6 a more even admin board.

agree

As we have seen with many governments and other orders, there are always traitors within. if we allow more members within the board we would be allowing allegiances to form but to few and it would be one Jedi against another. stay as we always have but keep greater communication within the board.

and i quote: "one to agree, one to disagree and one to confuse both sides". This question needs followup though, more discussion on the merits of different minima.

maybe no fewer than five

In any organisation with several members, leadership should be sizable.

Less than 5 is a bad idea because it would soon become a split monarchy.

This sounds ok to me

The more the better unless it is to many

I agree to no LESS than three. However, i think once a number is agreed upon we should maintain a filled seat council through emergency election if necessary.

Anything less will become a dictatorship

i believe at all times there will be 12 no more or less every so often we vote and change the council or have the checks and balances

We should have more people always leading us.

Balance must be kept

There should be 12 and this vote seems over redundant. Sir Liam

Agreed.

The Jedi Council Needs a diverse spread of power to avoid being corrupted

Ideas must be shared equally with all.

Should be more but never less

Yea, at least, to avoid dictators and monarchy

Would have to have a time in seat to provent them slipping down the path to the dark side

I think this is good but we should try to keep it at 12

There should be a minimum

6 to 7 would be more of a proper balance in my opinion in limiting the risk of corruption and any influences of corruption. Remember to look to the errors of what has already been tried...