It would severely impinge on my inalienable rights if my government restricted the carrying of weapons for personal protection?
|
On average, everyone agrees with significant nonconsensus between 30 voters. |
|
Please read the comments from other voters below, then scroll down make your decision. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It would severely impinge on my inalienable rights if my government restricted the carrying of weapons for personal protection
You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.
Reasons To DisagreeThe UK doesn't and we survive. 14 June 2020
|
Reasons To AgreeSecond Amendment, U.S. Constitution, The right to possess and bear arms shall not be infringed. 27 November 2018
It already does 27 November 2018
Without personal protection we can no longer protect ourselves, those around us nor our state or country as a backup army. 29 November 2018
Between Militias (if ever under invasion) or Revolution if necessary - all the way to protecting my loved ones... We, as living creatures, have the right to defend ourselves 15 December 2018
our forefathers gave us the right to have a weapon to protect ourselves and to overthrow the government if needed. 4 May 2020
The uk doesn’t allow for it I feel an impact 27 January 2024
|
Reasons for Remain Neutral
Not at all, I have no interest or need to carry a weapon. If it gets to the point where I feel I need a weapon on my person, either I am out to kill someone or I have gone somewhere unsafe that I likely shouldn't be going in the first place. I do not intend to do either.
My View
You can make your comments once you have voted.
You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.
